NSW Caselaw
[2000] 10 BPR 18,475 Reported Decision : [2001] ANZ ConvR 48 [2000] NSW ConvR 55-946
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : John Wakim & Sons v BBA Industries [2000] NSWSC 445 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2054/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 May 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2000
John Wakim & Sons Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v BBA Industries Pty Limited (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ
COUNSEL : P - Mr P J McEwen SC D - Mr D L Williams SOLICITORS : P - Adams Raves Marsh & Co D - Peter M Kinsey CATCHWORDS : Possession - whether concluded contract of sale - whether memorandum in writing - whether part performance - whether vendor estopped from denying that contract was concluded LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919, s54A Kirton v Nethery [1997] ANZ ConvR 53 GR Securities v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital (1987) NSW ConvR 55-324 Twynam Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Anburn Pty Ltd (1989) 6 BPR 13,448 Haydon v McLeod (1901) 27 VLR 395 McCaul v Clark [1929] VLR 233 CASES CITED : Westminster Estates Pty Ltd v Calleja (1970) 91 WN(NSW) 222 McBride v Sandland (1918) 25 CLR 69 Cooney v Burns (1922) 30 CLR 216 J C Williamson Ltd v Lukey and Mulholland (1931) 45 CLR 282 Steadman v Steadman [1976] AC 536 ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Widin (1990) 102 ALR 289 The Commonwealth of Australia v Clark [1994] 2 VR 333 DECISION : Dismissed with costs; see paragraph 22 for orders in relation to the Cross-Claim.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate