NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Vogt v Mercer [2001] NSWCA 3 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40717/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/01/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 February 2001
PARTIES : Terry Vogt v Helen Marjorie Mercer JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Foster AJA at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 70192/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Judge Sidis JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : H. Shore - Appellant A. Fennell - Respondent SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt, Newcastle - Appellant Orchiston Ranzetta Finney, Gosford - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Appeal against damages awarded in M.V.A. claim for personal injury- award fell outside ambit of exercise of judicial discretion - application to adduce fresh and further evidence - dispute concerning effect upon plaintiff of injuries sustained - result of 'functional overlay'. LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act, 1988 Kervan Trading Pty Ltd v Mercantile Mutual Insurance (Aust) Ltd (NSWCA unreported 14.12.2000) Wollongong Corporation v Cowan (1955) 93 CLR 435 Orr v Holmes (1948) 76 CLR at 640 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529 CASES CITED: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade (1991) 170 CLR 134 Warr v Santos [1973] 1 NSWLR 432 Radnedge v G.I.O. of N.S.W. (1987) 9 NSWLR 235 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 DECISION : I consider that the appeal fails. It should be dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate