NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Segal v Young [2001] NSWCA 141 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40460/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/05/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 May 2001
PARTIES : Allan L Segal v Robert Young JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Ipp AJA at 2; Rolfe AJA at 27
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 7565/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sinclair ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J Simpkins SC/E Frizell (Appellant) R Goodridge (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Yeldham & Associates (Appellant) Firth Lawyers (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - Application of statute - When time begins and ceases to run - respondent brought action against appellant solicitor for professional negligence in failing to commence action within time - meaning of a "day" - when one day ends and another day begins - Limitation Act 1969 ss 14(1), 63(1) - Interpretation Act 1987 s 36(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 Interpretation Act 1987 Prowse v McIntyre (1961) 111 CLR 264 CASES CITED: Australian National Airlines Commission v Newman (1987) 162 CLR 466 Stefanovich v Curran (unreported, NSWCA, 24 October 1998) DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40460/99 DC 7565/98
GILES JA IPP AJA ROLFE AJA
Friday 18 May 2001
ALLAN L SEGAL v ROBERT YOUNG
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate