NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Attorney General In and For the State of NSW v Spautz [2000] NSWSC 45 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 14464/89 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 February 2000
PARTIES : Attorney General In and For the State of NSW v Michael Edward Spautz JUDGMENT OF : Brownie AJ at 1
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr T Buddin SC & Mr Lonergan (for plaintiff) Mr M E Spautz in person SOLICITORS : Mr I V Knight (Crown Solicitor) Mr M E Spautz in person CATCHWORDS : Vexatious litigants - No question of principle LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 s84 DECISION : Motion dismissed with costs
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BROWNIE, AJ
Friday, 18 February 2000
14464/89 : ATTORNEY GENERAL IN AND FOR THE STATE OF NSW v SPAUTZ
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: Section 84 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 provides: "(1) Where any person (in this subsection called the vexatious litigant) habitually and persistently and without reasonable ground institutes vexatious legal proceedings, whether in the Court or in any inferior court, and whether against the same person or against different persons, the Court may, on the application of the Attorney-General, order that the vexatious litigant shall not, without leave of the Court, institute any legal proceedings in any court and that any legal proceedings instituted by the vexatious litigant in any court before the making of the order shall not be continued by the vexatious litigant without leave of the Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate