NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : REGINA v. SUEY [2001] NSWSC 543 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Criminal FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No. 70048 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 7.6.01; 14.6.01; 18.6.01; 19.6.01; 20.6.01; 28.6.01 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2001
PARTIES : REGINA v. SUEY, Ronald James JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1
COUNSEL : Crown: R.A. Hulme App: M.D. Farrar SOLICITORS : Crown: State Crown Solicitor App: Solaris CATCHWORDS : Application for enquiry subsequent to conviction - whether doubt or question as to guilt - 'sense of unease or disquiet' as to convictions - appeal to CCA against convictions on grounds of fresh evidence and convictions unable to be supported by the evidence or unreasonable - matters of fact on appeal remitted by CCA to a single judge of court of trial - necessity to determine issues - whether enquiry subsequent to conviction should be deferred until after appeal determined - applicant elects to abandon any ground of appeal covered by enquiry - enquiry directed. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 The application of Bernard Lewis Moore [2000] NSWSC 364 The application of Raymond Grant Pedrana [2000] NSWSC 975 Pedrana [2001] NSWCCA 266 CASES CITED : Johns [1999] NSWCCA 206 Varley v. Attorney General (1986) NSWLR 30 The application of Harry Rendell (1987) 32 A. Crim. R. 243 Canellis v. Slattery (1994) 33 NSWLR 104 DECISION : I direct that an Enquiry be conducted by a prescribed person in accordance with s.474E(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate