NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Riley v Cocco [2001] NSWCA 379 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40261/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 October 2001
PARTIES : Robert Bruce Riley (Appellant) Antonio Cocco (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Heydon JA at 2; Young CJ in Eq at 53
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC M34/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Patten DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr B H K Donovan QC/Mr B D Dooley (Appellant) Mr J P Guihot (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Marshall & Partners (Appellant) Hunt & Hunt (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Torts - Motor Accidents - Damages - Causation - Whether damages manifestly inadequate - Whether damages excessive - Whether trial juge made appellable errors in assessment of evidence - Construction of trial judge's language re damages for workers compensation repayments - Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW, s 79 - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act 1988 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438 CASES CITED: Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492 Wilson v Peisley (1975) 7 ALR 571 Wynn v NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 485 DECISION : See para 52
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40261/00 DC M34/98 MASON P HEYDON JA YOUNG CJ in Eq
26 October 2001 RILEY v COCCO Torts - Motor Accidents – Damages – Causation - Whether damages manifestly inadequate – Whether damages excessive – Whether trial judge made appellable errors in assessment of evidence – Construction of trial judge's language re damages for workers compensation repayments – Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW), s 79A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate