NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Puta, R v Nitrovic, R v Curry, R v Mackic, R v Oldham, R v Nanai [2001] NSWSC 225 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70040/99; 70026/99; 70209/99; 70208/99; 70016/99; 70211/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/12/2000 - 23/02/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2001
Regina (Crown) Arben Puta Zeljko Nitrovic PARTIES : Raymond Arthur Curry Goran Mackic Russell Oldham Satuala Nanai JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J at 1
Dan Howard with Nicole Noman (Crown) David Dalton (Puta) Jose Crespo (Nitrovic) COUNSEL : Allan Lucas (Curry) Glenn Whitehead (Mackic) John Stratton (Oldham) Ken Horler QC (Nanai) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Watsons (Puta) Jack Rigg (Nitrovic) SOLICITORS : Tully & Co (Curry) Ray Finlayson (Mackic) Michelle Goodwin (LAC) (Oldham) Anita Betts (Nanai)
CATCHWORDS : Sentence after verdicts of guilty of two counts of manslughter arising out of the same incident. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 CASES CITED : R v McHugh (1985) 1 NSWLR 588 R v Groombridge (CCA, unreported 20 September 1990) R v Barci (1994) 76 ACrim R 103 R v Engert (1995) 84 ACrim R 67 DECISION : See paras 62-67
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate