NSW Caselaw
(2001) 48 ATR 76 Reported Decision : [2001] ACL Rep 130 NSW 494 122 A Crim R 568
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v BAFFSKY [2001] NSWCCA 332 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60279/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 August 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 September 2001
PARTIES : Commissioner of Taxation (Appellant) Wayne Baffsky (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 110; Einfeld AJ at 111
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/12/0049 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Backhouse DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : T A Game SC / M M Cinque (Appellant) B Cross (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Commonwealth DPP (Appellant) Martin Ricci (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - revenue offence against Commonwealth - factors to be considered in exercising the discretion to dismiss a charge without proceeding to conviction - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s16A and s19B. Companies (Tasmania) Code Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Aikman v Bourne (1992) 63 ACrimR 467 Attorney General (NSW) v X (2000) 49 NSWLR 653 Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 DPP v El Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Wormald International Australia Pty Ltd (1985) 17 ATR 129 House v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kelton v Uren (1981) 27 SASR 92 Kowald v Hoile (No. 2) (1976) 14 SASR 314 CASES CITED: Jones v Morley (1981) 29 SASR 57 Lanham v Brake (1983) 34 SASR 578 McQuestin v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 2 TasR 30 Morrison v Peers (1995) 87 LGERA 39 O'Brien v Norton-Smith (MR) Pty Ltd (1995) 83 ACrimR 41 Patterson v Fenwick (1994) 115 FLR 462 R v Ingrassia (1997) 41 NSWLR 447 R v Paull (1990) 20 NSWLR 427 R v Sinclair (1990) 51 ACrimR 418 Thorneloe v Filipowski [2001] NSWCCA 213 DECISION : Questions in the Stated case answered as follows: 4(I) (a) No; (b) Yes; 4(II)(a) No; (b) Decline to Answer; (c) No; (d) No; 4(III)(a) Yes; (b) No; (c) No; 4(IV) Decline to Answer; 4(V) No.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate