NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Barbaro & Ors. v. Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor. [2000] NSWSC 474 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Civil FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11323/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/11/99, 25/11/99, 26/11/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 1999
PARTIES : Pasquale Barbaro Guiseppe Barbaro and Francesco Catanzariti (Plaintiffs) Director of Public Prosecutions and Commissioner of Police (Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J
J.V. Agius S.C. and A. Martin for the Plaintiffs COUNSEL : P.I. Lakatos for the Defendants Cater & Blumer, 112-144 Yambil Street, Griffith NSW 2680 Telephone: 069 62 1755I (Plaintiffs) C. Smith, Acting Solicitor for Public Prosecutions 265 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 9285 -8643 (First Defendant) I.V. Knight Crown Solicitor Level 5, 60-70 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 9224 5164 (Second Defendant)
SOLICITORS :
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Evidence - Listening Devices - Warrants - Contents of warrant - Meaning of "shall specify", "use", "premises on which", "place at which" - Period of warrant - Validity of listening device warrants LEGISLATION CITED : Listening Devices Act, 1984 S. 5, Part 4, S.16 (1),(4), (6A) , S.16(4), Schedule 2 Ousley v. The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 CASES CITED : Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Rossminster Limited (1980) AC 952 Haynes v. Attorney General (NSW) Supreme Court of NSW, 9 February, 1996, James J. unreported DECISION : Declaration as to invaliddity of one warrant; Defendant to pay half Plaintiff's costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate