NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) NSW ConvR 55-948
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SENAVALE v NOLAN [2000] NSWSC 619 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5038/1998 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/04/2000, 12/04/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2000
PARTIES : SENAVALE PTY LTD v KAY FLORENCE NOLAN AND HELEN FLORENCE NOLAN JUDGMENT OF : Master Macready at 1
COUNSEL : Mr P. O'Loughlin with Mr H Woods (P) Mr J.M. Roper (D) SOLICITORS : Clinch Neville Long (P) Willis & Bowring (D) CATCHWORDS : Contract - Implication of terms. Held in the circumstances the suggested terms would not be implied. - Conveyancing - Contract rescinded by vendor. Whether notice to complete required completion by a time or date. On its construction held it required completion by a time. Whether sufficient time allowed to make time of the essence. Having regard to estoppel by convention sufficient time allowed. - Conveyancing - Statutory protection of purchasers. Held that in the circumstances no order should be made under s 55(2A) of the Conveyancing Act. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of Nas Howship Holdings Pty Ltd v Leslie (1996) 41NSWLR 452 Capper v Thorpe (1998) 72 ALJR 716. Lester v Garland (1808) 15 Ves 248, 33 ER 748, Dodds v Walker (1981) 2 All Er 609 Carr - Keys v Avenus (1983) NSW Conv R 55-069 Missian Corporation Ltd v Telecom Auckland Ltd (1994) 2 NZLR 357. Karangahape Road International Village Ltd v Holloway 1989 1 NZLR 83; Lorne v Evans (1989) 1 Qd R 295) CASES CITED : Pacleyn Pty Ltd v GP Harris Real Estate Pty Ltd (1987) 4 BPR 9267. Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterhur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226 at 244; Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Associated Food v Baxter (1999) NSWSC 236. Mearns v Parras Holdings Pty Ltd (1994) NSW Conv R 55-705 at p 60,029 Carpenter v McGrath (1996) 40 NSWLR 39 Eighth SRJ Pty Limited v Merity Young J 25 March 1997 Bridges v McPhail 3 BPR 97189 Jampco Pty Ltd v Cameron (No 2) (1986) NSW Conv R 55-275 Gogard Pty Limited v Satnag Pty Ltd (1999) NSWSC 1283 DECISION : Paragraph 58
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate