NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MARONIS HOLDINGS LTD & ANOR v. NIPPON CREDIT AUSTRALIA LTD & ORS [2000] NSWSC 836 revised - 31/08/2000 CURRENT JURISDICTION: EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1946/94 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/08/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 August 2000
Maronis Holdings Limited (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Girvan Corporation (New Zealand) Ltd (In Liq.) (Second Plaintiff) Nippon Credit Australia Ltd (First Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
G. Kennett for Plaintiffs COUNSEL : F. Douglas QC/Parker for First Defendant
SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York for Plaintiffs Allen Allen & Hemsley for First Defendant CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE and PROCEDURE - legal professional privilege - discovery documents produced on subpoena - whether privilege waived by commencement of related proceedings - whether waiver of privilege imputable to related plaintiff. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 s 119 Supreme Court Rules Pt 23 Akins v Abigroup (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd (1995) 35 NSWLR 405 Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 CASES CITED : Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 Goldberg v Ng (1996) 185 CLR 83 Mann v Carnell (1999) 74 ALJR 378 Standard Chartered Bank v Antico (1995) 36 NSWLR 87 Telstra Corp v BT Australasia (1998) 85 FCR 152 Thomason v Campbelltown Municipal Council (1930) 39 SR(NSW) 347 DECISION : Claim of privilege from inspection of documents - not allowed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate