NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Howe v Rosier & Anor; King v Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) & Anor [2001] NSWSC 1194 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Administrative Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30062/00; 30063/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 March 2001, 1 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 December 2001
Kenneth Edward Howe (Plaintiff) v Stephen Rosier (First Defendant) & Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) (Second Defendant) PARTIES : Raymond Thomas King (Plaintiff) v Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) (First Defendant) & The Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) Second Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
Mr J B Bishop/Mr N Packer (Howe) COUNSEL : Mr B J Gross QC (King) Mr M G Rudge SC with Mr R Webb (Defendants) Heard McEwan Lawyers (Howe) SOLICITORS : Thurlow Fisher (King) Hartmann & Associates (Defendants) Greyhound Racing Authority Act 1985 LEGISLATION CITED : Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 Crimes Act 1900 Webb v The Queen (1993-1994) 181 CLR 41 Hall v The NSW Trotting Club Limited [1997] 1 NSWLR 378 CASES CITED : Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 141 CLR 288 Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) & ors (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 at 417 DECISION : Summonses dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate