NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 21 NSWCCR 637
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Amaca Pty Ltd formerly known as James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v CSR Ltd [2001] NSWSC 263 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50053/1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 April 2001
PARTIES : Amaca Pty Ltd formerly known as James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) CSR Ltd (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J
COUNSEL : CG Gee QC/TGR Parker (Plaintiff) PW Taylor SC/JE Fernon (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Allen Allen & Hemsley (Plaintiff) Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : STATUTES - Interpretation. Extent of exclusive jurisdiction of the Dust Diseases Tribunal in respect of cross claims for contribution between joint tortfeasors under the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989. LEGISLATION CITED : Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 Carnuccio v Cinzano (1990) 6 NSWCCR 70 Fencott v Muller (1982-1983) 152 CLR 570 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry & Anor; Seltsam Pty Ltd v Barry & Anor [2000] NSWCA 353 CASES CITED : Law Society of New South Wales v Weaver (1974) 1 NSWLR 271 Mangion v James Hardie & Co Pty Limited (1990) 20 NSWLR 100 National Parks & Wildlife Service & Anor v Stables Perisher Pty Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 573 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Energy Australia (1999) 17 NSWCCR 720 Stack v Coast Securities (No.9) Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 261 DECISION : Tribunal's jurisdiction in respect of cross claims not exclusive.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate