NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL V. WATKINS [2001] NSWCA 364 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40709/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 October 2001
PARTIES : Parramatta City Council - appellant Beverley Watkins - respondent JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2-30; Rolfe AJA at 31
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 16/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Robison DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr. P. Garling SC with Mr. V. Heath for appellant Mr. P. Bates for respondent SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox, Sydney for appellant Gerard Malouf & Partners, Parramatta for respondent CATCHWORDS : LOCAL GOVERNMENT - Roads - Alleged danger to pedestrians - Council's liability - TORT - Negligence - Pedestrian injured by fall in road - Whether road hazardous - Whether Council should have taken steps to alleviate danger. D. Brodie v. Singleton Shire Council (2001) 75 ALJR 992 CASES CITED: Webb v. South Australia (1982) 56 ALJR 912 David Jones v. Bates [2001] NSWCA 233 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40709/99 DC 16/98 POWELL JA HODGSON JA ROLFE AJA
Friday 12th October 2001 PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL V. WATKINS
Judgment 1 POWELL JA: I agree with the reasons of Hodgson JA as set out below. 2 HODGSON JA: On 10th September 1999, Robison DCJ gave judgment for Beverley Watkins against Parramatta City Council in the sum of $131,078.35, as damages for injuries suffered by Ms. Watkins when she fell in South Street, Granville on 29th March 1996. Parramatta City Council has appealed to this Court against the finding that it was liable for damages, but does not challenge the quantum of damages.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate