NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kang v Kwan & 2 Ors [2001] NSWSC 624 revised - 27/07/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3510/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/07/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 July 2001
Wei Ling Kang (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Christopher Anthony Kwan (First Defendant) Eileen Woowin (Second Defendant) Kate Woowin (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : M A Robinson (Plaintiff) M Einfield, QC (First Defendant) SOLICITORS : Legal Aid Commission (Plaintiff) Verekers (First Defendant) CATCHWORDS : PROPERTY — Caveat — Caveatable interest — No proper description of an available caveatable interest — Possibility of amending caveat. LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act s74K; s74L Beca Developments Pty Ltd v Idameneo (No. 92) Pty Ltd (1990) 21 FamLR 459 CASES CITED : Depsun Pty Ltd v Tahore Holdings Pty Ltd (1990) ANZConvRep 334 The Marriage of Stevens (1991) 15 FamLR 51 DECISION : Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
REVISED — 27 July, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 3510/99 Wei Ling Kang Plaintiff Christopher Anthony Kwan First Defendant Eileen Woowin Second Defendant Kate Woowin Third Defendant
JUDGMENT — ex tempore 13 July 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate