NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Hayes [2001] NSWCCA 358 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60776/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/9/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 September 2001
PARTIES : Regina Gregory Peter Hayes JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1, 38; Carruthers AJ at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/21/0108 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Karpin DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : D M L Woodburne (Crown) P R Boulten (App) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) D J Humphreys (App) CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - appeal against allegedly excessive sentence - maliciously wound with intent to do grievous bodily harm - sentence to be served in protective custody - whether sufficient allowance for plea of guilty Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act Astill (No 2) (1992) 64 A Crim R 289 Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 R v Costin [1989] 11 Cr App R (s) 182 CASES CITED: R v Lo [2001] NSWCCA 271 R v Stabler [1984] 6 Cr App R (s) 129 R v Thomson & Anor (2000) 49 NSWLR 383. Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465. DECISION : Application for leave to appeal allowed. Appeal dismissed.
- 15 -IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60776/00 SULLY J CARRUTHERS AJ Wednesday 12 September 2001
Regina v Gregory Peter Hayes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate