NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : RABO EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD v. BOUTAYEH [2001] NSWSC 517 CURRENT JURISDICTION: EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2598/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 5/06/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2001
Rabo Equipment Finance Limited - Plaintiff Pierre Boutors Boutayeh - First Defendant JMJ Refunds Pty Limited - Second Defendant Petro Mariam Holdings Pty Limited - Third Defendant PARTIES : Westpac Banking Corporation - Fourth Defendant Joseph Alexander - Fifth Defendant Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd - Sixth Defendant Imad Boutayeh - Seventh Defendant St George Bank Limited - Eighth Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
J. Marshall - Plaintiff COUNSEL : J. Gooley - Fifth Defendant
SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron - Plaintiff John Spence & Associates - Fifth Defendant CATCHWORDS : INJUNCTION - interlocutory injunction - plaintiff sought injunction restraining dealing with Fixed Deposit into which it claimed to trace part of proceeds of funds obtained by fraud - defendant explained on oath his dealings and circumstances in which payment was made to him - on the facts the plaintiff's prospects of success did not warrant interlocutory injunction - injunction obtained ex parte was dissolved. Lipkin Gorman v. Karpnale Limited [1991] 2 AC 548 CASES CITED : Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited v. Westpac Banking Corporation 164 CLR 662 David Securities Pty Ltd v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia 175 CLR 353 DECISION : See para.[16]. Injunction dissolved.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate