NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 126 A Crim R 508
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Perese [2001] NSWCCA 478 revised - 14/12/2001 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60455/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2001
PARTIES : The Crown Jonathon Perese JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 2; McClellan J at 59
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/12/0190 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kirkham DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P G Berman SC (Crown) T S Corish (Appl) SOLICITORS : Director of Public Prosecutions D J Humphreys CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentencing - whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive - whether principles in R v Henry & Ors applied - whether adequate weight given to plea of guilty - whether sentencing judge erred by not separately identifying the component of the sentence relating to different offences LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 s 97(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 33(3) R v Henry & ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) HCA 64 R v Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED: R v Barton [2001] 1 NSWCCA 63 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Bavadra (2000) 115 A Crim R 152 R v Harris [2001] NSWCCA 322 R v Lemene [2001] NSWCCA 5; 118 A Crim R 131 R v Dawson [2000] NSWCCA 399 DECISION : See para 94
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60455/00 BEAZLEY JA HULME J McCLELLAN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate