NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lowy v Alexander [2000] NSWSC 661 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3888 of 1997 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 and 16 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 July 2000
PARTIES : Peter Lowy (Plaintiff) David Alexander (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr G.K. Burton (Plaintiff) Mr M. Dempsey (Defendant) SOLICITORS : K.M. Harkness & Co (Plaintiff) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - fiduciary obligations - solicitor and client - solicitor acting for two parties entering into a loan agreement where only one provided security - duty to advise client giving security to obtain independent advice - whether duty not to act - TORTS - negligence - solicitor acting for joint borrowers - one giving security - limit of retainer - informed consent to acting for both parties Beach Petroleum NL v Abbott Tout Russell Kennedy (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 NZLR 465 Browne v Dunn [1894] 6R 67 Clark Boyce v Mouat [1994] 1 AC 428 Farrington v Rowe McBride & Partners [1985] 1 NZLR 83 CASES CITED : Fitzpatrick v Waterstreet [2000] ANZConvR 15 Gilbert v Shanahan [1998] NZLR 528 Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449 Moody v Cox & Hatt [1917] 2 Ch 71 O'Halloran v R.T. Thomas & Family Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 DECISION : See paragraph 30
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
WINDEYER J
WEDNESDAY 12 JULY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate