NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 A Crim R 506
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60377/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Steven John Clark JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Dowd J at 219; Bell J at 239
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70076/00 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Barr J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr G E Smith (Crown) Mr C P Heazlewood (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) Baker Ryrie Rickards Titmarsh (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal against conviction - Evidence - Unreliable evidence - Judicial directions to jury - Whether necessity for unreliable evidence warning - Where Crown's major witness testified under indemnity from prosecution - Where no such warning sought at trial - Whether leave should be granted to argue point - Whether witness was "criminally concerned in the events giving rise to the proceeding" - Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 165 - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal against conviction - Evidence - "Relationship evidence" - Admissibility - Evidence of contemporaneous representations by deceased demonstrating deceased's negative state of mind about relationship with appellant - Exception to hearsay rule - Whether unfairly prejudicial justifying exclusion - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55(1), 72 and 135-137 - Criminal Law - Murder - Appeal against sentence - Whether non-parole period of less than three-quarters of head sentence warranted - Whether appellant's intellectual/physical difficulties amounted to "special circumstances" - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 44(2) - D Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Albrighton v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital [1980] 2 NSWLR 542 B v R (1992) 175 CLR 599 R v Bedingfield (1879) 14 Cox CC 431 R v Blick [2000] NSWCCA 61 R v Booth [1982] 2 NSWLR 847 R v Carranceja (1989) 42 A Crim R 402 R v Chai (1992) 27 NSWLR 153 R v Checconi (1988) 34 A Crim R 160 Davies v Director of Public Prosecutions [1954] AC 378 R v Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267 R v Farler (1837) 8 C & P 106 R v Fraser (NSWCCA, 10 August 1998) R v Frawley (1993) 69 A Crim R 208 R v Fulcher [1995] 2 Cr App R 251 R v Garner (1963) 81 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 120 Gipp v R (1998) 194 CLR 106 Glennon v R (1994) 119 ALR 706 R v Gratton (1971) 4 NBR (2d) 14 R v Heath [1991] 2 Qd R 182 R v Hissey (1973) 6 SASR 280 R v Iuliano [1971] VR 412 Kailis v R (1999) 21 WAR 100 Khan v R [1971] WAR 44 R v Letteri (unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 March 1992) R v Lewis (1906) 8 WALR 83 R v Ling (1982) 6 A Crim R 429 CASES CITED: McNee v Kay [1953] VLR 520 R v MM (2000) 112 A Crim R 519 KRM v R (2001) 178 ALR 385 Majara v R [1954] AC 235 R v Mason (1869) 5 Aust Digest 881-2 R v Ncanana 1948 (4) SA 399 O'Leary v R (1946) 73 CLR 566 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Peake (1996) 67 SASR 297 Pearmine v R [1988] WAR 315 R v Perry [1970] 2 NSWR 501 R v Pipe (1966) 51 Cr App R 17 Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234 R v Ready [1942] VLR 85 R v Robichaud (1938) 13 MPR 22 R v S [2000] 1 Qd R 445 R v Sawoniuk [2000] 2 Cr App R 220 Shaw v R (1952) 85 CLR 365 Singleton v Ffrench (1986) 5 NSWLR 425 R v Sneesby [1951] Qd R 26 R v Stewart [2001] NSWCA 260 R v Tevendale [1955] VLR 95 R v Toki (2000) 116 A Crim R 536 R v Tripodina (1988) 35 A Crim R 183 R v Tsingopoulos [1964] VR R v Vollmer [1996] 1 VR 95 Wilson v R (1970) 123 CLR 334 R v Wozniak (1988) 16 NSWLR 185 DECISION : The appeal against conviction is dismissed; the application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate