NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pinnacle Homes (NSW) P/L v Zekusic & Anor [2001] NSWSC 515 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Administration Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30079/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 June 2001
Pinnacle Homes (NSW) Pty Limited (Plaintiff)
Mark Zekusic and PARTIES : Vanessa Zekusic (First Defendants)
Fair Trading Tribunal (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
LOWER COURT Fair Trading Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT BU 1999/92 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Tribunal Member Christine Paull JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Mr P A Fury (Paintiff)
COUNSEL : Mr R W Seton (First Defendants)
Submitting Appearance (Second Defendant) Coudert Brothers (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : Colin Daley Quinn (First Defendants)
Crown Solicitor (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of Fair Trading Tribunal LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1998 Fair Trading Tribunal Act CASES CITED : Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 DECISION : (1) The plaintiff's time to appeal is extended up to and including 26 October 2000; (2) The decision of the Tribunal members dated 13 April 2001 and 28 September 2000 are affirmed; (3) The appeals are dismissed; (4) The further amended summons filed 18 January 2001 is dismissed; (5) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate