NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Constable v Anvic Holdings P/L & Ors [2001] NSWSC 444 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Administrative Law List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30008 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 May 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 May 2001
Robert Julian Constable (Plaintiff) v PARTIES : Anvic Holdings Pty Limited (formerly called Tilecraft (Aust) Pty Limited) (First Defendant) Prestige Tiles Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Fair Trading Tribunal of New South Wales (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
LOWER COURT Fair Trading Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT BU 1999/199 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT J P Gallagher JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Mr S A Kerr (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr A J Thompson (First Defendant) N/A (Second Defendant) N/A (Third Defendant) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Brook Worthington (First Defendant) Stephen Blanks & Associates (Second Defendant) I V Knight - Crown Solicitor - Submitting Appearance (Third Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Application for rehearing - stay, extension of time - nature of the relief provided by s 63 - fair and equitable - rules of natural justice and procedural provisions - policy of tribunal in dealing with applications for rehearing and rehearing. LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Tribunal Act 1998, s 3; Pt 4 s 25, s 27, s 31, s 32; Pt 6 ss 60, 61, 62, 63 and 64. CASES CITED : Holloway v Chairperson of Residential Tribunal of New South Wales BC200005147. DECISION : See Paragraphs 48 - 50.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate