NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Gillard v Hunter Wire Products Pty Ltd t/as Hunter Screen Products [2001] NSWCA 382 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40935/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 November 2001
PARTIES : Bradley James Gillard v Hunter Wire Products Pty Limited t/as Hunter Screen Products JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Sperling J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 43/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT His Honour Judge Delaney JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - I. M. Wales SC, M. Condon Respondent - A. Hewitt SC, A. Hourigan SOLICITORS : Appellant - Walsh & Blair Respondent - Rankin & Nathan CATCHWORDS : Quantum appeal as to assessment of past and future economic loss DECISION : Appeal allowed - see par 27.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40935/99 DC 43/98 PRIESTLEY JA SPERLING J
Thursday, 1 November 2001 GILLARD v HUNTER WIRE PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED t/as HUNTER SCREEN PRODUCTS QUANTUM APPEAL AS TO ASSESSMENT OF PAST AND FUTURE ECONOMIC LOSS – trial judge had used "cushion" or "buffer" method for both – this method not appropriate in light of facts as found by trial judge – reassessment of losses therefore necessary – judgment for higher figures to be given – draft orders to be brought in incorporating figures found by this court, together with amounts for interest and superannuation, and otherwise reflecting this court's opinion on 9 November 2001. ORDERS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate