NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Hyder Consulting (Australia) P/L v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency P/L & Anor [2001] NSWCA 313 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40955 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/09/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 November 2001
Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Limited v PARTIES : Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency Pty Limited And James Thiessen & Associates Pty Limited JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 25; Giles JA at 56
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 2754 of 1998 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sorby DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Appellant: G Inatey SC with G P McNally COUNSEL : 1st Respondent: D Hammerschlag SC with I H Bailey 2nd Respondent: I G B Roberts Appellant: Colin Biggers & Paisley SOLICITORS : 1st Respondent: Barker Gosling Lawyers 2nd Respondent: Minter Ellison Lawyers CATCHWORDS : Contract - construction of pavement - where after four years' use pavement collapsed - whether ACEA terms limiting liability were part of contract - assessment of damages - reduction for betterment - appeal allowed - cross-appeal allowed. Empirnall Holdings Pty Ltd v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 at 617-8 Badham v Williams (1968) NZLR 728 Harbutt's 'Plasticine' Unlimited v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Limited [1970] 1 QB 447 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Jebsen v East and West India Dock Co (1875) LR 10 CP 300 Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31 CASES CITED: Murphy v Brown [1985] 1 NSWLR 131 J & B Caldwell v Logan House Retirement Home [1999] 2 NZLR 99 James Street Hardware and Furniture Co v Spizziri (1987) 62 OR (2d) 385 Maxitherm Boilers Pty Ltd v Pacific Dunlop Ltd & Anor (1998) 4 VR 559 at 569 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon ("Mikhail Lermontov") (1991) NSWLR 1 at 8-9 and 24-25 Central Coast Leagues Club Limited v Gosford City Council (9 June 1998, unreported) Director of War Services Homes v Harris (1968) QdR 512 De Cesare v Deluxe Motors Pty Limited (1996) 13 BCL 136 Hoad v Scone Motors Pty Ltd (1977) 1 NSWLR 88 DECISION : IN THE APPEAL BY THE ENGINEER:- a) Appeal allowed; b) verdict and judgment for the owner set aside, and in lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the engineer; c) owner to pay the engineer's costs of the trial and of the appeal, and to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified. IN THE CROSS-APPEALS BY THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER:- a) Appeals allowed; b) verdict and judgment for the owner in the amount of $578,163 set aside, and in lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the owner in the amount of $426,138; c) owner to pay architect's costs of the appeal, and to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate