NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dridi v Fillmore [2000] NSWSC 175 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1101/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 and 4 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 February 2000
Daniel Mourredine Dridi (P) PARTIES : Donald Russell Fillmore (D1) Warren John Marx (D2) Hugh Hunter Jamieson (D3) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
Ms S Dowling (P) COUNSEL : D Perrignon (D1) D L Davies SC (D2 & 3) C P White & Hetherington (P) SOLICITORS : Gregory Falk & Associates (D1) Makinson & d'Apice (D2 & 3) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [338] - Equitable remedies - Injunctions - Interlocutory injunctions - Balance of convenience - Propriety of attempting to forecast ultimate result - Relevance of strength or weakness of plaintiff's case. LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Supreme Court Rules, Part 60 r 1A(1)(c), Schedule D Part 3 cl 4(a) Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 CASES CITED : Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (6th Ed, 1997), [1310] [1311] Meagher, Gummow & Lehane, Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (3rd Ed, 1992), [2169] DECISION : Application for interlocutory injunctive relief to permit plaintiff to reside in disputed property pending trial refused.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
FRIDAY, 4 FEBRUARY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate