NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rabo Equipment Finance Pty Ltd v Boutayeh [2001] NSWSC 1179 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2598/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 and 10 December 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2001
Rabo Equipment Finance Limited (P) Pierre Boutors Boutayeh (D1) JMJ Refunds Pty Limited (D2) Petro Mariam Holdings Pty Limited (D3) PARTIES : Westpac Banking Corporation (D4) Josef Shadi Alexander (D5) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (D6) Imad Tanious Boutayeh & Kilda Boutayeh (D7) St George Bank Limited (D8) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : J E Marshall (P) No appearances (D1 - 8) Blake Dawson Waldron (P) No appearance (D1 - 3) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (D4) SOLICITORS : John Spence & Associates (D5) No appearance (D6) Chahoud & Associates (D7) No appearance (D8) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [91] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Service - Where personal service not required - Where defendants in default of appearance - Service of statement of claim effected by filing - Necessity of service of notice of motion dispensed with. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 9 r 12, Part 13 r 2, Part 18 r 3 & Part 19 r 2 DECISION : Default or summary judgment entered against four defendants.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate