NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : HOWES v DOBSON DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD [2001] NSWCA 96 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40238/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 December 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 April 2001
PARTIES : HOWES & ORS v DOBSON DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Powell JA at 107; Giles JA at 112
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT SC 11728/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Master Malpass JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: J Needham/M Fraser Respondent: G K Downes QC/ M Green SOLICITORS : Appellant: Legal Aid Commission Respondent: Gregory J Halpin CATCHWORDS : Retirement Villages Act 1989 - Retirement Villages Act 1999 - whether Retirement Village Industry Code of Practice applied - definition of "retirement village" - definition of "administering authority" of retirement village - whether Act precludes Supreme Court's jurisdiction - whether owner precluded from terminating licence agreements - application of new Act to retirement villages established before its commencement - Appeal allowed. ND. DECISION : Appeal allowed. See par 106 for orders.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40238/00 SC 11729/99 MASON P POWELL JA GILES JA
Tuesday 10 April 2001
HOWES & ORS v DOBSON DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD
The Elim Retirement Village was administered From May 1993 by Christian Enterprises Ltd (CEL). Residents at the village would on arrival sign a licence agreement with CEL. In March 1996 CEL purported to raise licence fees to $70 per week.
In June 1999 Dobson Developments Pty Ltd (Dobson) purchased 14 units within Elim from CEL, subject to the residents' licence agreements. On 3 June 1999 Dobson sought payment of the licence fees at the rate of $70 per week. On not receiving payment, Dobson served notice on each licensee (appellant) asserting default, and requiring them to vacate their unit. Dobson contends that these notices terminated its contracts with the appellants.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate