NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION v SOMOSI [2001] NSWCA 285 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40197/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/08/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2001
PARTIES : New South Wales Bar Association (Claimant) Lawrence Robert Somosi (Opponent) JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Sheller JA at 87; Giles JA at 88
COUNSEL : P Garling SC / R Bromwich (Claimant) F M Douglas QC / H Bauer / M Kumar (Opponent) SOLICITORS : Tress Cocks & Maddox (Claimant) McClellands (Opponent) CATCHWORDS : LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Professional discipline - where barrister consented to removal of his name from the Roll - where barrister failed to file taxation returns or pay income tax for seventeen years - where convicted of offences of failing to comply with a notice issued by the Australian Taxation Office - whether declaration as to whether fit and proper person for legal practice appropriate - whether declaration of professional misconduct appropriate - ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE - whether collateral attack - whether unfair prejudice - Evidence Act 1995, s135 Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v SRT (1999) 91 FCR 234 CASES CITED: New South Wales Bar Association v Hamman [1999] NSWCA 404 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Ritchard (NSWCA, 31 July 1987, unreported) Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279 DECISION : 1 Declaration of professional misconduct made; 2 Declaration that not a fit and proper person made
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate