NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) 35 ACSR 551 (2001) NSW ConvR 55-969
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MI Design P/L v Dunecar P/L & 1 Ors [2000] NSWSC 996 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4011/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/09/00, 25/09/00, 26/09/00, 05/10/00, 06/10/00, 10/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 2000
MI Design Pty Limited (Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) PARTIES : Dunecar Pty Limited (ACN 083 651 781) (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ACN 123 123 124) (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Sean Patrick O'Connell (Third Cross-Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
M Pesman (Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) COUNSEL : L J Aitken (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant) F Kunc (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Ian D Elvy & Associates (Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) SOLICITORS : Colbron & Associates (First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant) L E Taylor (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY — Mortgages — Lessee ousted without the notice required under lease, contract with bank and s129 of Conveyancing Act — Consequences — Relevance of breaches of Liquor Act — Relief against forfeiture — Specific performance of agreement between lessor and bank — Discretionary aspects — Damages not adequate remedy — Lessee insolvent — Would reinstatement involve a futility. Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s127; s129 Corporations Law Pt 5.3A Gaming and Betting Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED : Law and Property Act 1925, s86 Liquor Act 1898 Liquor Act 1982, s67(1); s68; s69; s101; s143A Real Property Act 1925, s55A Chaka Holdings Pty Ltd v Sunsim Pty Ltd (SCNSW, Young J, 3 September 1987, unreported) Chan v Cresdon Pty Limited (1989) 168 CLR 242 Coghlan v Peel (1906) 6 SRNSW 560 CASES CITED : Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia v Eagle Hotels Pty Limited (1990) NSW ConvR 55-506 Hayes v Gumbola Pty Limited (1988) NSW ConvR 55-375 Montague v Pooley [1951] StRQd 291 Pioneer Quarries (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Permanent Trustee Co of NSW Ltd (1970) BPR 9562 Shiloh Spinners Limited v Harding (1973) AC 691 DECISION : Lessee entitled to be reinstated.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate