NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ceccattini & 1 Ors v ICM 2000 P/L & 1 Ors [2000] NSWSC 174 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2696/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/03/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2000
Gualtiero Ceccattini (First Plaintiff) (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Emilio de Michelis (Second Plaintiff) ICM 2000 Pty Limited (ACN 072 573 785) (First Defendant) Westpac Industries Pty Limited (ACN 069 592 034) (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : D Warren (Plaintiffs) W Haffenden (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Lapaine Pomare & Forster (Plaintiffs) Smits Leslie (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — Overriding purpose of "just, quick and cheap" resolution of civil disputes — Effect of Plaintiffs' delay inter alia in lodging application for leave to appeal on trial judge's interlocutory orders — Stay refused without prejudice to application to Court of Appeal who will know prospects of leave and timetable for appeal — No justification for even short stay when application made at last minute. DECISION : Stay not granted.
REVISED — 17 March, 2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 2696/97 GUALTIERO CECCATTINI First Plaintiff EMILIO de MICHELIS Second Plaintiff ICM2000 PTY LTD (ACN 072 573 785) First Defendant WESTPAC INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 592 034) Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate