NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Keys [2001] NSWCCA 232 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60031/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/06/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2001
PARTIES : Nathan Arthur Keys The Crown JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ at 1; Badgery-Parker AJ at 2; Newman AJ at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/0402 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Coorey J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : RF Sutherland - Crown PM Stickland - Applicant SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor - Crown DJ Humphreys - Applicant CATCHWORDS : Crown appeal - knowingly concerned in drug importations - need to identify precisely what offender did - whether guideline judgment applicable - general deterrence outweighs subjective matters - inadequate sentence - discussion of discretion to refuse appeal - resentencing - avoidance of double punishment - ratio between non-parole period and total sentence LEGISLATION CITED : Customs Act 1901 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLIP 610 R v Wong and Leung (1999) 108 A Crim R 531 R v Olbrich (1999) 108 A Crim R 464 R v Camilleri, (CCA unreported, 8 February 1990) Regina v Baker NSWCCA 85 (28 March 2000) Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 227 CASES CITED: R v Wilson (1981) 28 SASR 362 R v Tait (1979) 24 ALR 473 Regina v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 R v Bang (NSWCCA unreported, 1 September 1992) Regina v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 Regina v Kukunoski (NSWCCA unreported, 17 August 1989) Regina v Blanco (1999) 106 A Crim R 303 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Regina v Thompson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 DECISION : Crown appeal allowed. The sentences imposed in the District quashed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate