NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Sabag v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 411 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40146/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 November 2001
Juan Sabag (Appellant) PARTIES : v Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Davies AJA at 2; Sperling J at 75
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Medical Tribunal LOWER COURT 40018/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Taylor J, Dr Child, Dr Arnold, Mr Berry JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A: Mr J R Young, Mr E N Gramelis R: Mr S Rushton SC SOLICITORS : A: Bilias & Associates, Solicitors & Barristers R: D M Swain, Solicitor CATCHWORDS : Medical Tribunal determination - removal from Register of Medical Practitioners - unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct of medical practitioner - procedural fairness. Medical Practice Act 1992, ss 36, 37, 43, 63, 64, 90, 91, 165 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977, s 13 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, s 28 Bannister v Walton (1993) 30 NSWLR 699 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Mummery v Irvings Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 99 Maloney v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1978) 52 ALJR 292 Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 50 ALJR 666 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 Re Palmer and Minister for the Capital Territory (1978) 1 ALD 183 Smith v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1984) 53 ALR 551 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 CASES CITED: HCCC v A Medical Practitioner [2001] NSWCA 158 Ma v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 37 FCR 225 Richter v Walton (NSWCA, 15/7/93, unrep) Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54 Yung v Adams (1997) 150 ALR 436 Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186 NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 Adams v Yung (1998) 83 FCR 248 HCCC v Pham [1999] NSWCA 39 Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 DECISION : Set aside the decision of the Medical Tribunal. Remit the matter to a differently constituted Medical Tribunal, to be heard and decided again. Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate