NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Chisholm v Pittwater Council & Anor [2001] NSWCA 104 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40550/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/04/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2001
PARTIES : Samuel Chisholm v Pittwater Council & Willeroon Pty Limited JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Powell JA at 2; Ipp AJA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT LEC 40046/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Talbot J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
N Hemmings QC (Appellant) COUNSEL : R Lancaster (First Respondent) D F Jackson QC/A E Glasso (Second Respondent) Allen Allen & Hemsley (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jacques (First Respondent) Deacons (Second Respondent) CATCHWORDS : BUILDING CONTROL & TOWN PLANNING - consent and approval of councils - development application - property within conservation area - heritage significance of property - clause 32 of Local Environmental Plan - whether council properly considered clause 32 and the relevant conservation plan - elements of conservation plan - council found to have considered all relevant matters under clause 32 LEP - approval of development application upheld. D LEGISLATION CITED : Acts Interpretation Act 1987 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40550/00 LEC 40046/00 MEAGHER JA POWELL JA IPP AJA
Tuesday 24 April 2001 SAMUEL CHISHOLM v PITTWATER COUNCIL and WILLEROON PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate