NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pareezer & Ors v Coca-Cola Amatil & Ors [2001] NSWSC 1097 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20018 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 November 2001
Craig Douglas Pareezer (First Plaintiff) Suzanne Joy Pareezer (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES : Scott Craig Pareezer by his tutor Suzanne Joy Pareezer (Third Plaintiff) v Coca-Cola Amatil (NSW) Pty Limited (now trading as Beverage Bottlers (NSW) Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) NSW Tafe Commission (First Cross Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
Mr J Darvall (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : Mr G M Watson (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Mr A C Bridge SC (First Cross Defendant) Heazlewoods (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Hicksons(First Cross Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Duty of care to prevent injury resulting from the criminal behaviour of third party owed by occupier of land upon which it takes place - special circumstances - amendment of Statement of Claim and striking out of Cross-Claim. LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s 5. CASES CITED : Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil [2000] 176 ALR 411. DECISION : See Paragraphs 24 - 25.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION 20018 of 2000 Master Malpass
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate