NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : RTA v CREMONA [NO 2] [2001] NSWCA 459 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40652/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2001
PARTIES : Roads and Traffic Authority - Appellant Minna Maarit Cremona - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Stein JA at 14
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT 75/94 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dowd J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C T Barry QC/A Porthouse - Appellant B M J Toomey QC/M Kumar - Respondent SOLICITORS : I V Knight - State Crown Solicitor - Appellant Riley, Gray-Spencer - Respondent CATCHWORDS : COSTS LEGISLATION CITED : N/A CASES CITED: Fotheringham v Fotheringham (No 2) (1999) 46 NSWLR 194 DECISION : 1 The Court notes the matters set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 6 of the Short Minutes of Orders; 2 The Court makes orders 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10,11,12 and 13; 3 The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal and cross-appeal on an indemnity basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40652/00 CL 75/94 PRIESTLEY JA SHELLER JA STEIN JA
Friday, 7 December 2001 ROADS AND TRAFFIC AUTHORITY v CREMONA [NO 2]
Judgment 1 PRIESTLEY JA: I agree with Sheller JA. 2 SHELLER JA: On 16 November 2001 the Court delivered its reasons for judgment and stood this appeal and cross-appeal over to 30 November 2001 for submissions on costs and the handing up of short minutes of orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate