NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : James Hardie & Coy v Yeomans [2000] NSWSC 539 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11194 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 June 2000
James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v Byron Robert Yeomans (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
LOWER COURT Costs Assessment JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 90406/2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Michael W Robinson JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr J A Timbs QC/Mr T G R Parker (Plaintiff) Mr A J Leslie QC/A O Leslie (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Allen Allen & Hemsley (Plaintiff) Turner Freeman (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Legal professional privilege - production of documents to costs assessor pursuant to s 207 - voluntary or under compulsion of law - limited waiver and implied or imputed waiver. LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987, s 207, s 208H, s 208L. Attorney General v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475. Chilcotin Pty Ltd & Anor v Cenelage Pty Ltd & Ors (1999) NSWCA 11. Giannarelli v Wraith (No 2) (1991) 71 CLR 692. Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83. CASES CITED : Mann v Cornell (1999) HCA 66. Network Ten v Capital TV (1995) 36 NSWLR 275. Sevic v Roarty (1998) 44 NSWLR 287. Waind v Hill (1978) 1 NSWLR 372. Woollahra Municipal Counsel v Westpac (1992) 33 NSWLR 529. DECISION : See paragraphs 42-43.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate