NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 121 A Crim R 90
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Klein, Lucy Pearl [2001] NSWCCA 120 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60713/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 March 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Lucy Pearl Klein JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 22; Simpson J at 32
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0516 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Solomon DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : D Staehli - Crown G Jones - Respondent SOLICITORS : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Crown Freemans Solicitors - Respondent CATCHWORDS : SENTENCE - drug importation - Crown appeal - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - (by majority) not manifestly inadequate. ND R v Behar (NSW CCA 14 October 1998); R v Benais (1999) NSW CCA 236; R v Budiman (NSW CCA 8 September 1998); R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243; R v Chu (1998) (NSW CCA 16 October 1998); R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim 349; CASES CITED: R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231; R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Laurentiu and Becheru (NSW CCA 1 October 1992); R v Lawson, Wu and Thapa (NSW CCA 12 December 1997); R v Leroy (1984) 2 NSWLR 441; R v Stead 99 NSW CCA 4; R v Wong (1999) 48 NSWLR 340; R v Zayat (NSW CCA 22 November 1996). DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 060317/00 DC 11/11/0516
GILES JA WOOD CJ at CL SIMPSON J Monday 19 March 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate