NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Atroushi [2001] NSWCCA 406 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60848/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/9/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 October 2001
PARTIES : Regina Safar Atroushi JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Howie J at 2; Carruthers AJ at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/21/2058 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL O'Reilly DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R A Hulme (Crown) C J Watson (App) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : Conviction Appeal - stalking - whether relationship evidence admissible - whether probative value of evidence outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice. Crimes Act 1900, s 35, s 93G(1)(a)(i), s 562AB LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s99 Evidence Act, 1995, s 55, s 135, s 136, s 137. Alford v Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v AN (2000-2001) 117 A Crim R 176 CASES CITED: R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Etherington (1982) 32 SASR 230 R v Garner (1963) 81 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 120 R v MM (2000) 112 A Crim R 519 R v Vandine (1970) 1 NSWR 252 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Wilson v The Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
- 20 -IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60848/98 GILES JA HOWIE J CARRUTHERS AJ Friday 12 October 2001 Regina v Safar Atroushi
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate