NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 54 NSWLR 198 129 A Crim R 42
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v KG [2001] NSWCCA 510 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60144/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 September 2000; 15 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 December 2001
PARTIES : Regina v KG JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Greg James J at 40; Kirby J at 41
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/31/0092 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL His Honour Judge Coolahan OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown - Mr T. Buddin Respondent - Mr P. Byrne SC, Mr P. Harper SOLICITORS : Crown - S.E. O'Connor CATCHWORDS : Submission of questions of law pursuant to s 5A(2) of Criminal Appeal Act - questions concerned the interpretation of R v Tillott and effect upon it of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - Held, R v Tillott laid down advisory guidelines not mandatory rules of exclusion - not necessary to answer other questions. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited v The Attorney General (2 August 2000) Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) 1986 189 CLR 51 CASES CITED: Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485 R v McFelin [1985] 2 NZLR 750 R v Tillott (1995) 38 NSWLR 1 DECISION : Question 1 answered no. Not necessary to answer questions 2 and 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60144100
PRIESTLEY JA GREGJAMESJ KIRBY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate