NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Young v Lamb (No.2) [2001] NSWSC 1014 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5096/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 November 2001
Robert Francis Patrick Young (P) Kenneth John Lamb (D1) PARTIES : Louise Ann Lamb (D2) William Thomas Newell (D3) Dianne Margaret Newell (D4) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : M Heath (P) S Dixon (D) SOLICITORS : Button Hawdon & McMahon (Batemans Bay) (P) Daryl Hurst (Moruya) (D) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - assessment of damages - tenants' breach of contract to renew lease - loss of rent - damage to demised premises would have caused rent to abate if tenant had performed the contract by renewing the lease - damages for loss of rent reduced by amount corresponding to abatement - mitigation of loss - landlord failed to find tenant for three year duration of renewed term - whether landlord had mitigated loss British Westinghouse Co v Underground Railway [1912] AC 673 Buchanan v Byrnes (1983) 3 CLR 179 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 313 Marshall v Mackintosh (1898) 78 LT 750 CASES CITED : Nangus Pty Ltd v Charles Donovan Pty Ltd [1990] VR 184 NLS Pty Ltd v Hughes (1966) 120 CLR 583 Progressive Mailing House v Tabali Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 17 Re Eastdoro Pty Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 Qd R 424 Wenkart v Pitman (1998) 46 NSWLR 502 DECISION : Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $120,629 (loss of rent $106,148 and interest $14,481)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate