NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 124 A Crim R 151
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Ngo; Dinh; Dao [2001] NSWSC 339 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Criminal FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70086/98; 70059/99; 70223/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 & 20 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2001
Regina PARTIES : Phuong Canh Ngo - Accused David Duy Thai Dinh - Accused Tu Quang Dao - Accused JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J
Mr M.A.G. Tedeschi QC / Mr R.A. Hulme - Crown COUNSEL : Mr J.C. Nicholson SC / Mr P.J. Pearsall - Ngo Mr R. Hoenig - Dinh Mr G.J.T. Cusack QC / Ms B.J. Rigg - Dao S.E. O'Connor - Crown SOLICITORS : L.M.G. Solicitors & Attorneys - Ngo Legal Aid Commission of NSW - Dinh Jackson Smith, Solicitors - Dao CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE - evidence - application for witnesses to give evidence by video-link - witnesses scared of accused Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998, ss 5(1A), 5A, 5B, 20A LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Amendment Act 2000, no. 16, Sch 1[5] SCR, Pt 36 r 2A, Pt 75 r 8 R v McHardie and Danielson [1983] 2 NSWLR 733 R v Smellie (1919) 14 Cr App R 128 CASES CITED : R v DJX and ors (1990) 91 Cr App R 36 R v Sparkes (Supreme Court of Tasmania - unreported 1 October 1996) R v West (1990) 51 A Crim R 317 DECISION : See para 27.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate