NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 54 NSWLR 1 127 A Crim R 9
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v ZVONARIC [2001] NSWCCA 505 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60147/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 December 2001
Regina
PARTIES : v
Peter Ian ZVONARIC JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Sully J at 21; Adams J at 23
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/31/0400 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Karpin DCJ OFFICER :
Appellant in person COUNSEL : P G Berman SC (Crown) Appellant in person SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : Appellant unfit for trial - special hearing - necessity for arraignment - whether evidence must be sworn - whether person charged may consent to tender of entire prosecution case - desirability of reading tendered statements - adequacy of reasons - appeal allowed - verdicts of acquittal entered Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68; (1998) 197 CLR 250; 103 A Crim R 121 CASES CITED: R v Presser [1958] VR 45 Raybos Australia Pty Limited v Jones (1985) 2 NSWLR 47 DECISION : See paragraph 52
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60147/01 SPIGELMAN CJ SULLY J ADAMS J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate