NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tweed Shire Council v Wood-Lightbound [2000] NSWSC 153 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11057/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 November 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 March 2000
Tweed Shire Council (Appellant) PARTIES : Lorna Wood-Lightbound (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 33/1998 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Magistrate Lindon JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Mr M W Robinson (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr M J Leeming (Defendant) Halliday & Stainlay Murwillumbah SOLICITORS : (Plaintiff)
Potts Latimer (Defendant) Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 Supreme Court Rules Buckle v Bayswater Road Board (1963) 57 CLR 259 Hughes v Hunters Hill Municipal Council (1992) 29 NSWLR 232Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) ATR 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Press v Mathers (1927) VLR 326 CASES CITED : Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 The Australian Gas Light Company v The Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Campbelltown City Council v Crain (NSWCA, 23 October 1998 unreported) Threadgate v Tamworth City Council (NSWCA, 24 February 1998 unreported) Lake Macquarie Shire Council v Bottomley [1999] NSWCA 28 Singleton Shire Council v Brodie [1999] NSWCA 37 Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council [1999] NSWCA 51 DECISION : See para 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate