NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jarratt v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 547 revised - 21/06/2000 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20068/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 June 2000
PARTIES : Jeffrey Thomas JARRATT - Plaintiff JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr T K Tobin QC with Mr S Campbell - Plaintiff Mr W H Nicholas QC with Mr T Blackburn - Defendant SOLICITORS : Verekers - Plaintiff Freehill Hollingdale & Page - Defendant CATCHWORDS : Defamation - imputations - difference in substance - SCR Pt 67 R 11(3) - form of imputations - degree of specificity required - capacity of matter complained of to convey imputations. DECISION : Application to strike out imputations refused.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION Defamation List
SIMPSON J
Monday 19 June 2000
20068/00 Jeffrey Thomas JARRATT v JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD Judgment
HER HONOUR : 1 The plaintiff claims damages for defamatory imputations he alleges were conveyed by the defendant in three separate publications, dated, respectively, 8 September 1999, 5 October 1999 and 7 February 2000. Each publication was contained in the edition for the relevant day of the Sydney Morning Herald of which (it may be accepted for present purposes) the defendant was the publisher. The plaintiff pleads that he is and was at all material times a Deputy Commissioner of the NSW Police Service and Commander, inter alia, of the Communications Group of that Service. This is a separate trial of preliminary issues raised by the defendant relating to the imputations pleaded on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant seeks orders striking out the imputations pleaded.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate