NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 37 ACSR 617 (2001) 19 ACLC 1000
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : David Hill & 1 Ors v David Hill Electrical Discounts P/L (in Liq) & 1 Ors [2001] NSWSC 271 revised - 30/04/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1851/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 April 2001
DAVID HILL (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : JUSTIN HILL (Second Plaintiff) DAVID HILL ELECTRICAL DISCOUNTS PTY LIMITED (in liquidation) (First Defendant) ANTONY DE VRIES (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : J E Thomson (Plaintiffs) V R W Gray (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Gordon & Johnstone Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Abbott Tout (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Deed administrator becoming liquidator — Application for liquidator to be replaced in order for matters concerning the liquidator in earlier role as deed administrator may be investigated — Need for non-conflicted and impartial liquidator for that purpose — Duties of deed administrator — Liability for insolvent trading — Shadow director? — Deed administrator as deemed officer of company for purposes of duty of care and diligence — Deed administrator as fiduciary. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law s9; s180; s445D; 446A; 447A; 503 Supreme Court Rules Pt 39 r7 CASES CITED : Advance Housing Pty Ltd (in liq) v Newcastle Classic Developments Pty Ltd (1994) 14 ACSR 230 DECISION : Liquidator removed and another substituted.
REVISED — 30 April, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate