NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 530 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 June 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1
I Barker Q.C. M R Hall (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : R Stitt Q.C. J S Wheelhouse (Defendant) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : On defendant's Notice of Motion - SCR Pt 31 r 2 - in relation to "the Elomari tapaes" - proceedings pending in Court of Appeal DECISION : See paragraph 15
DLJT: 172 (Ex Tempore - Revised) [2000] NSWSC 530
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
TUESDAY 13 JUNE 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant) JUDGMENT (On defendant's Notice of Motion - SCR Pt 31 r 2 - in relation to " the Elomari tapes " - proceedings pending in Court of Appeal) 1 HIS HONOUR: Leave was granted this morning to the defendant to file in court a Notice of Motion applying for orders under SCR Pt 31 r 2, for the separate trial of the eight issues set out in the Notice of Motion. 2 Also handed up this morning was a document prepared for the plaintiff, setting out three questions proposed on his behalf. 3 The issues raised in the defendant's Notice of Motion are as follows: "1. Whether the document MFI 191 should be admitted into evidence as probative of the fact that warrant no 308 of 1995 was granted pursuant to section 16, Listening Devices Act ("the Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate