NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 511 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3081/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 5, 6 December 2000 (then written submissions) JUDGMENT DATE : 22 June 2001
Peter Lawrence Lewis (P) PARTIES : Lamru Pty Ltd (Applicant) Brian Raymond Silvia (Liquidator) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
J T Johnson (P) COUNSEL : S J Motbey (Applicant) P A Somerset (S)(Liquidator) Kemp Strang (P) SOLICITORS : Lyons & Lyons (Applicant) P A Somerset & Co (Liquidator) CATCHWORDS : DEEDS [2]- Recitals- Effect. WORDS & PHRASES- "Deliver". Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 1 MacQueen 461 Arwe v White 381 A (2d) 737 Carter v Carter (1857) 3 K & J 617; 69 ER 1256 CASES CITED : J & S Holdings Pty Ltd v NRMA Insurance Ltd (1982) 41 ALR 539 Spellson v George (1992) 26 NSWLR 666 T Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 2 All ER 492 Trinidad Asphalte Co v Coryat [1896] AC 587 Vreeland v Vreeland 21 A 627 (1891) DECISION : See para 70.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
YOUNG CJ in Eq
FRIDAY 22 JUNE 2001
3081/97 - LEWIS v NORTEX PTY LTD
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: On 4 September and 4 October 2000, the Court reluctantly ordered that five questions be considered before the other issues in these proceedings. In these questions the words "impugned document" means any version of annexure F to the affidavit of P L Lewis sworn 23 August 2000. The questions are:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate