NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Blake v John Fairfax Publications Limited & Anor [2000] NSWSC 883 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20279 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 September 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 September 2000
DOMINIC BLAKE (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS LIMITED (First Defendant)
DAVID SYME & CO LIMITED (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
R A Campbell (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : W H Nicholas Q.C. (Defendants) Gallagher de Reszke (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : Freehills (First Defendant)
Minter Ellison (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Imputations - form - capacity - coincidence with words in matter complained of DECISION : See paragraphs 9 - 17
DLJ: 1 (Ex Tempore - Revised) [2000] NSWSC 883
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20279 of 2000
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
FRIDAY 1 SEPTEMBER 2000
DOMINIC BLAKE (Plaintiff)
v
John Fairfax Publications Limited (First Defendant)
DAVID SYME & CO LIMITED (Second Defendant)
JUDGMENT (Imputations - form - capacity - coincidence with words in matter complained of)
1 HIS HONOUR: Mr Dominic Blake has instituted proceedings against John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited and David Syme & Co Limited in respect of a publication in what I will describe as the weekend supplement to the publishers' respective newspapers on 17 October 1999. 2 The article upon which Mr Blake sues bears a headline "Help yourself" and its theme, in very general terms, is citizens' arrests. 3 It is the paragraph numbered 3 at the end of the second column that specifically, as part of the whole article as I understand it, is relied upon as giving rise to the pleaded imputations. That paragraph is in the following terms: "Stunned. This is the citizen that went too far. Dominic Blake, of Woolloomooloo, Sydney, caught a 12-year-old boy throwing rocks at his house. He called the police, then used a stun-gun to give the boy electric shocks. Blake, 32, was found guilty of assault, causing actual bodily harm and possessing a prohibited weapon". 4 It can be taken that the imputations pleaded by the plaintiff are as follows: "(a) the plaintiff broke the law by the manner of his performing a citizen's arrest on a twelve year old boy.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate