NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Southern Graphtec Systems P/L v Atlantek Australasia P/L [2001] NSWSC 583 revised - 12/07/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1589/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/07/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 July 2001
PARTIES : Southern Graphtec Systems Pty Limited (ACN 003 559 662) (Plaintiff) Atlantek Australasia Pty Limited (ACN 094 035 382) (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : M W Young (Plaintiff) D S Mitchell (Solicitor) (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Forshaws Neill (Plaintiff) Ledlin Partners (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Statutory Demand — Representations relied upon to ground genuine dispute or offsetting claim — Available for former but not latter as damages amount not sufficiently ascertainable given obligation to mitigate loss so should be set at $1. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law s459G Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s87(2)(a) or (b) or (ba) CASES CITED : Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 669 Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No. 1) (1994) 13 ACSR 455 DECISION : Statutory Demand set aside. Respondent to pay Applicant's costs.
REVISED — 12 July, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 1589/01 Southern Graphtec Systems Pty Limited (ACN 003 559 662) Plaintiff Atlantek Australasia Pty Limited (ACN 094 035 382) Defendant
JUDGMENT — ex tempore 9 July 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate