NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney v Kondrajian [2001] NSWCA 308 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41010/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/09/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 September 2001
PARTIES : The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney v Ana Kondrajian JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 2; Ipp AJA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 774/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Delaney DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : I G Harrison SC (Appellant) W P Kearns SC/P Biggins (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Makinson & d'Apice (Appellant) Smith Monti & Costs (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : PERSONAL INJURY - nervous shock - duty of care - sporting accidents - school's liability for foreseeable risk. The Commonwealth v Introvigne (1982) 150 CLR 258 at 269 State of Victoria v Bryar (1970) 44 ALJR 174 Geyer v Downs (1977) 138 CLR 91 Richards v State of Victoria [1969] VR 136 Lepore v State of New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 112 Edgecock v Minister for Child Welfare (1971) 1 NSWLR 751 at 758 Williams v Eady (1893) 10 TLR 41 at 42 Miller v South Australia (1981) 24 SASR 416 CASES CITED: Chapman v Hearse (1961) 106 CLR 112 at 121 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 at 47-48 Kretschmar v The State of Queensland (1989) Aust Torts Reports 80-272 Kady v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church, unreported, NSWCCA, 19.2.97 Nobrega v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church, unreported, NSWCCA 23.3.99 Cooke v Kent County Council (1949) 82 Lloyds L R 823 Wright v Cheshire County Council (1952) 2 All ER 789 Derrick v Cheung [2001] HCA 48 Jeffrey v London County Council (1954) 52 LGR 521 at 523 Rosenberg v Percival [2001] HCA 18 DECISION : (a) Appeal is upheld; (b) The cross-appeal is dismissed; (c) The orders made by Delaney DCJ are set aside; (d) Judgment is ordered in favour of the appellants; (e) Respondent's claim is dismissed; (f) The respondent to pay the costs of the action between her and the appellants and the costs of the appeal; (g) The responent is entitled to a certificate under the Suitors Fund, if qualifed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate